Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
PeerJ ; 11: e15024, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2290901

RESUMO

Misdiagnosing suspected COVID-19 individuals could largely contribute to the viruses transmission, therefore, making an accurate diagnosis of infected subjects vital in minimizing and containing the disease. Although RT-PCR is the standard method in detecting COVID-19, it is associated with some limitations, including possible false negative results. Therefore, serological testing has been suggested as a complement assay to RT-PCR to support the diagnosis of acute infections. In this study, 15 out of 639 unvaccinated healthcare workers (HCWs) were tested negative for COVID-19 by RT-PCR and were found seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein-specific IgM and IgG antibodies. These participants underwent additional confirmatory RT-PCR and SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific ELISA tests. Of the 15 individuals, nine participants were found negative by second RT-PCR but seropositive for anti-spike IgM and IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibodies confirming their acute infection. At the time of collection, these nine individuals were in close contact with COVID-19-confirmed patients, with 77.7% reporting COVID-19-related symptoms. These results indicate that including serological tests in the current testing profile can provide better outcomes and help contain the spread of the virus by increasing diagnostic accuracy to prevent future outbreaks rapidly.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Imunoglobulina G/análise , Imunoglobulina M/análise , Teste para COVID-19
2.
Viruses ; 13(7)2021 07 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1325787

RESUMO

Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the general population. Here, we aimed to evaluate and characterize the SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity rate in randomly collected samples among HCWs from the largest referral hospitals and quarantine sites during the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic in the city of Jeddah, the second largest city in Saudi Arabia, using a cross-sectional analytic study design. Out of 693 participants recruited from 29 June to 10 August 2020, 223 (32.2%, 95% CI: 28.8-35.8) were found to be confirmed seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and among those 197 (88.3%) had never been diagnosed with COVID-19. Seropositivity was not significantly associated with participants reporting COVID-19 compatible symptoms as most seropositive HCW participants 140 (62.8%) were asymptomatic. The large proportion of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases detected in our study demands periodic testing as a general hospital policy.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adulto , Animais , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Infecções Assintomáticas , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/virologia , Teste Sorológico para COVID-19 , Chlorocebus aethiops , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Controle de Infecções , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quarentena , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Arábia Saudita/epidemiologia , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Células Vero
3.
Viruses ; 12(12)2020 12 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-966996

RESUMO

The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by SARS-CoV-2, continues to spread globally with significantly high morbidity and mortality rates. Antigen-specific responses are of unquestionable value for clinical management of COVID-19 patients. Here, we investigated the kinetics of IgM, IgG against the spike (S) and nucleoproteins (N) proteins and their neutralizing capabilities in hospitalized COVID-19 patients with different disease presentations (i.e., mild, moderate or severe), need for intensive care units (ICU) admission or outcomes (i.e., survival vs death). We show that SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG, IgM and neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) were readily detectable in almost all COVID-19 patients with various clinical presentations. Interestingly, significantly higher levels of nAbs as well as anti-S1 and -N IgG and IgM antibodies were found in patients with more severe symptoms, patients requiring admission to ICU or those with fatal outcomes. More importantly, early after symptoms onset, we found that the levels of anti-N antibodies correlated strongly with disease severity. Collectively, these findings provide new insights into the kinetics of antibody responses in COVID-19 patients with different disease severity.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , COVID-19/imunologia , Imunidade Humoral , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/sangue , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Hospitalização , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Cinética , Estudos Longitudinais , Testes de Neutralização , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo/imunologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia
4.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 16561, 2020 10 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-834906

RESUMO

As the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by the novel SARS-CoV-2, continues to spread rapidly around the world, there is a need for well validated serological assays that allow the detection of viral specific antibody responses in COVID-19 patients or recovered individuals. In this study, we established and used multiple indirect Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)-based serological assays to study the antibody response in COVID-19 patients. In order to validate the assays we determined the cut off values, sensitivity and specificity of the assays using sera collected from pre-pandemic healthy controls, COVID-19 patients at different time points after disease-onset, and seropositive sera to other human coronaviruses (CoVs). The developed SARS-CoV-2 S1 subunit of the spike glycoprotein and nucleocapsid (N)-based ELISAs not only showed high specificity and sensitivity but also did not show any cross-reactivity with other CoVs. We also show that all RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 patients tested in our study developed both virus specific IgM and IgG antibodies as early as week one after disease onset. Our data also suggest that the inclusion of both S1 and N in serological testing would capture as many potential SARS-CoV-2 positive cases as possible than using any of them alone. This is specifically important for tracing contacts and cases and conducting large-scale epidemiological studies to understand the true extent of virus spread in populations.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Betacoronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico , Soroconversão , Testes Sorológicos/métodos , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Betacoronavirus/genética , COVID-19 , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Proteínas do Nucleocapsídeo de Coronavírus , Reações Cruzadas , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Coronavírus da Síndrome Respiratória do Oriente Médio/genética , Coronavírus da Síndrome Respiratória do Oriente Médio/imunologia , Pandemias , Fosfoproteínas , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA